Category: Road Tests

Can-Am Ryker Rally Review: Tripedalism on and off the beaten path

SAMSUNG CSC

SAMSUNG CSC

View the 18 images of this gallery on the original article

The Can-Am Ryker Rally is a conundrum masked as a three-wheeled motorcycle. It looks rad — we wanted to call it a tadpole in mid-frog metamorphosis, but it turns out they get their back legs first — is generally comfortable on the road and quite a bit more capable off-road than we expected. It doesn’t do a single thing better than a more traditional two- or four-wheeler, but it gets close enough in several categories that it’s a worthwhile addition to enough garages to make sense as a viable purchase decision.

But let’s be very clear: The Can-Am Ryker Rally is not a product designed to appeal to everyone. Or even most people. It’s more like a well-aimed dart for a small contingent of the population.

Power comes from a 900cc inline-three engine. It sends 82 horsepower and 58 pound-feet of torque through a continuously variable automatic transmission to the single rear tire, which is sufficient thrust to smoke both the 205/55R15 rear rubber and pretty much all other traffic from a standing stop. The brakes are very powerful, and the anti-lock system, which is activated both front and rear from a single foot-mounted lever, feels confident and secure.

The Ryker Rally is a quick little thing in the city, scooting away from stoplights to 35 miles per hour in true hooligan style. Things slow down drastically from there as the Rally’s CVT settles into its desired rev range, so passing times at highway speeds aren’t anywhere near as impressive as a launch from zero. It’s not slow, but it could certainly use a bit more upper-rpm horsepower. The Akrapovič exhaust system lets out enough of the guttural sounds of the Rotax-supplied engine that it’s still audible even on the highway.

Owners may not want to spend a whole lot of time at highway speeds anyway. While its ergonomics are good — adjustable handlebars and peg positions are certainly helpful here — and the saddle is plenty comfortable, the Ryker’s tripod design doesn’t lend itself well to long and straight stretches of road. It often develops a bit of a wiggle as the two front tires fall into and out of grooves on the asphalt, the sail-like riding position means wind gusts can be disconcerting and require frequent steering correction, and no matter where a bump in the road may lie, it’s often impossible to avoid due to the three contact patches. Steering the Ryker is also a chore that takes strong pressure on the handlebars, and since it doesn't lean, sweeping corners require that hefty heave for their duration. The faster you go, the more these issues become tiresome. Fortunately, cruise control helps remove one variable from the rider’s brain.

Stick to around-town speeds and most of these complaints are no longer a problem. The suspension — double wishbones up front and a massive single swingarm housing the shaft drive at the rear — boasts KYB shocks that are adjustable in four positions. Loosen the preload and turn down the compression to offer a softer ride and surface imperfections become less likely to bump and jar the Ryker Rally off course. Its abundant low-end torque is perfect for turning pavement into playground.

Perhaps most surprisingly, there’s plenty of fun to be had off the pavement. Keeping the compression damping clicked down, the soft suspension setup works well on bumpy dirt roads. Rally mode, selectable through the digital display directly in front of the rider, allows a much greater degree of slip from the rear than the street-oriented Standard or Sport modes. It doesn’t completely turn traction control off, and ABS programming remains active on the brakes. We found the Rally very entertaining and controllable on loose surfaces, and it’s able to cover ground much more quickly than we’d have guessed. With just under 5 inches of ground clearance, the Ryker Rally is not meant for climbing rocks or traversing muddy trails, but dirt or gravel roads are definitely in play.

An under-trike skid plate is a welcome piece of standard kit. We also appreciate the sweet rally-inspired wheels, intake prefilter, front pushbar and hand guards. Not only do they complete the aggressive look, they’re all functional.

There’s a small trunk at the front of the Ryker, and our test model was also equipped with a single piece of luggage. Neither was large enough to hold a full-face helmet, but we were able to place a large camera up front and a wadded-up jacket and gloves in the side bin. We wouldn’t recommend the Ryker Rally as a vehicle to fully replace a small car, but even a limited amount of storage space is useful. There are quite a few additional storage options available from Can-Am that would make the Ryker more useful for commuters, but we weren’t able to test them.

For riders well accustomed to life on two wheels, the Ryker Rally is going to feel odd at first, and probably eventually limiting. Its acceleration and road-holding performance, while entertaining, are not up to the levels that experienced motorcyclists will demand. It’s not great as a mount to watch the miles stack up in the rearview mirror, and it’s not particularly practical as a daily commuter.

So, who is it for? There’s a sizable portion of the fun-loving population that is averse to life on two wheels, whether due to the need to balance a large bike or because shifting is a difficulty. Some due to physical limitations, others due to fear and uncertainty. All are valid. The Ryker lineup offers such riders a glimpse into the motorcycling lifestyle, and it does so in a much more bike-like package than something like a Polaris Slingshot. To wit, in our experience riders of other motorcycles will wave to someone on a Ryker but not to a Slingshot driver.

The Ryker Rally is also potentially appealing to the small subset of buyers who want to have a little bit of off-pavement chops but need something comparatively comfortable and reliable to get from their driveways to their dirty destinations. It’s not a replacement for a proper dual-sport bike, but it might pull double duty for some riders who might otherwise be looking at a side-by-side UTV but are put off by the lack of street-legal options.

Another part of the Can-Am Ryker Rally’s appeal is its reasonable price. The model line starts at $9,599 with a twin-cylinder 600cc Rotax engine; the larger 900cc engine is optional on this base model. For $12,499 Can-Am offers the Ryker Sport that comes standard with the larger engine and adjustable suspension. The Ryker Rally model we tested comes in at a still acceptable $14,599.

We weren’t expecting the Can-Am Ryker Rally to be as entertaining as it is. It may be limited in scope, and it would not replace a two-wheeled motorcycle in our own fantasy garage, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t fun to ride. Considering the equitable cost of entry, we think the smiles-per-dollar quotient adds up well for would-be buyers looking for a plaything that can pull double duty in town and on the trails.

7 thoughts about the 2024 Toyota Land Cruiser 1958

John Beltz Snyder

John Beltz Snyder

View the 29 images of this gallery on the original article

The new, 2024 Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, cheaper and simpler than the generation that came before. It’s not quite as capable as the one before it, which might not be the best news for hardcore off-roaders (though it still comes with standard, full-time four-wheel drive, rear and center locking differentials, crawl control, various terrain modes, and it offers a manually disconnecting stabilizer bar in the higher “Land Cruiser” trim). On the other hand, it's good news for folks who missed the nameplate, want another choice in rugged Toyota SUVs, and need something that’s a decent daily driver that can get you a bit off the beaten path.

We spent several days with the Toyota Land Cruiser 1958, the base trim starting at $57,400 (including $1,450 in destination fees). It uses the i-Force Max hybrid powertrain, which we’ve sampled in other Toyotas, and have liked so far. It’s also pretty basic, especially when it comes to the interior, as you’ll see in the paragraphs and photos below. Besides equipment quantity, materials quality is significantly lower than what you'll find in the "Land Cruiser" trim. Hard plastics and cloth upholstery are present instead of soft-touch surface and leather. Of course, it’s also $11,000 cheaper than the "Land Cruiser" (who thought that naming scheme was a good idea, by the way?). With that, here are several thoughts about the 2024 Toyota Land Cruiser 1958.

1. Boxy is back, it seems

Car design goes through cycles, it seems, of boxy, curvy, boxy, curvy, etc. Right now, it’s pretty clear that we’re entering another angular generation. As a kid who grew up loving 1980s Volvos, I’m pumped about it. It’s always looked good on off-roaders, too. This Land Cruiser is a pretty good execution of it. The multitude of straight lines and sharp angles make me want to bust out my large son’s Lego collection and start building cars of my own. Furthermore, the rigid geometry makes elements like the circular headlights and air vents really stand out. Whether you actually like that will depend on your personal taste. It’s almost a little too severe of a contrast, making me just the slightest bit uncomfortable, but I think it ends up being more fun than the pixel headlights of the eponymous Land Cruiser trim.

2. The grille is cool

Just look at it. It looks like some sort of cage. Where everything else today seems to have some sort of diamond mesh or big, chunky bars, the grille on this Land Cruiser looks quite wiry. The amount of negative space is off-putting, like rocks and bugs and road debris could dive right in there and do some damage, and make it a huge pain in the neck to clean. Yet, I still like it, at least visually. I wish I could replace all the hardware cloth on my chicken pen with this stuff, “TOYOTA” logo and all.

3. The hybrid powertrain is slick

All hail the i-Force Max! This 2.4-liter turbo mates to an eight-speed automatic with an integrated electric motor, providing a total of 326 horsepower and 465 pound-feet of torque. No, it’s not as efficient as your average hybrid, rated at 22 miles per gallon city, 25 highway and 23 combined, but boy is it great to use. Despite being down on horsepower from the previous Land Cruiser generation, the extra torque makes it feel quite responsive around town. While it may not post superb 0-60 times (nor does it need to), this powertrain is super-smooth and linear. I found it quite satisfying to use in daily driving. Whether I was cruising leisurely, trying to get somewhere in a hurry or creeping down a rutted dirt road, it always felt composed and unharried.

4. The interior … wow

The 1958 feels like 1985. It’s almost impressive how oppressive all the cloth and plastic are. How much gray can you handle? This is budget rental-car spec. Is it weird that I kind of like it?

5. But cloth seats aren’t terrible in the heat

The weather was quite warm when I had the Land Cruiser, and though there aren’t ventilated seats, the cloth chairs didn’t burn me like leather would when my skin touched the upholstery. The texture of the cloth is nice and airy, too, keeping my back from getting sweaty in the heat. The seats arere pretty soft, providing more cushion than support, which isn’t all too terrible in an upright seating position like this. I’d be curious to see how they will stand up over time, though.

6. The suspension is pretty good on-road

I found it a huge relief that the suspension in this Land Cruiser isn’t a total roller coaster. In the last Land Cruiser, whatever you put on the front passenger seat was certain to end up on the floor, whether it was a backpack, a water bottle or, in at least one instance, a bag of takeout — way more so than other cars under much harder braking. Hit the accelerator, the nose would go up. Do anything more than just brush the brake pedal, and it felt like the nose was going to burrow into the ground. It made for pretty miserable commuting.

The new Land Cruiser feels a lot less newborn-colt-like on its feet. There’s a little bit of give from the front suspension when you get on the brakes, but it didn’t dump my entire dinner on the floor between the restaurant and my house. It’s a lot more comfortable for it, too. All that porpoising gets tiring, and I’m glad to see it gone.

7. The suspension is still good when the pavement ends and the road gets rutty

Transitioning from good to poor pavement, then to no pavement at all, the Land Cruiser seems totally at ease. Going down gravel roads, dirt roads and roads that are barely roads at all (more moonscapes, really), this SUV shows its eagerness to keep going further, taking whatever you could put in its path. I’d love to take this thing to some trails up in North Michigan. I feel like it could tackle them without the kids shouting in discomfort about all the jostling. If I were going to go that route, though, I’d probably want to pony up for the equipment on the “Land Cruiser” trim. But the 1958 is plenty good for most of the light work you might encounter getting to a campsite or cabin in the woods … if you’re cool with that interior.

Related video:

1996 Jaguar XJS Convertible Retro Review: Fancy a good waft ’round Goodwood?

Tim Stevens

CHICHESTER, England – Everything seems like it's moving faster these days than it used to. Whether it be trendy memes or systems of government, what was popular yesterday doesn't stand a chance today. That's true of cars, too. Every major model is expected to have a refresh every couple of years followed by a complete reboot after five or six.

In that context, the 21-year staying power of the Jaguar XJS is nothing short of remarkable, especially if you look at the decades it spanned.

Introduced in 1975, the XJS (or XJ-S as it was initially known) survived all the way into 1996 before finally running out of its nine lives, all with such subtle visual tweaks that you have to be a bit of an expert to spot the differences introduced over the three decades it covered.

The 1996 model you see here is as new as it gets, yet it still very much looks, feels, and even smells like a much older machine -- albeit with some curious injections of technology here and there to spoil the air of nostalgia.

This one is a British-market 4.0-liter inline-six-cylinder model with 242 horsepower and 289 pound-feet of torque sent through what must be the laziest transmission I've ever encountered, a four-speed ZF automatic. But relaxed, as it turned out, would be the overriding vibe of this car, something I actually came to appreciate before my time with this beautifully preserved example was through.

We didn't get off to a great start. My test drive took place on the historic Goodwood Circuit, best known for the high-class hooning of the annual Goodwood Revival.

I would not do any drifting, nor crashing thank goodness, but the on-track nature of my run did mean I needed to wear a helmet. That proved to be a bit of a problem.

I'm not a particularly lanky 6-foot tall, and the XJS is not a small car, so without overthinking it, I tucked my way in, ducking beneath the low roof of this XJS cabriolet. I expected that, once inside, I could adjust the seat and get myself situated.

Whoever had driven this previously was apparently quite a bit shorter of stature because the seat was bolt upright and tight to the wood-rimmed steering wheel. Now properly trapped and in a bit of a panic, I stabbed at the chunky, plastic seat controls on the door only to quickly learn the seats won't move without the ignition on. My knee was wedged so tightly up against the steering column that I couldn't reach the ignition.

After a few attempts, I got the key turned and the seat in motion. Further and further back I had to recline the thing before I could finally uncoil my neck. It's a Corvette-like posture I had to assume here, knees akimbo and arms outstretched.

My newly laid-back seating position seemed to fit with the aforementioned vibe of the car, and now somewhat comfortable, I took a moment to enjoy the time capsule. It makes a good impression, the XJS. Beautifully polished walnut abounds, including the ball atop the spindly tall shifter that you'd be forgiven for mistaking for a manual.

That lovely wood, however, is punctuated by all manner of things, a few of which ruin the mood. There's the polished metal ashtray, a lovely touch reminiscent of many high-end '60s GT cars, like the Lamborghini 400 GT. It's a lovely relic from the early days of this car's design that sits just a few inches away from less enjoyable relics: a clumsy black plastic cassette deck and digital clock.

The XJS, then, doesn't give the time capsule effect so much as it provides a retrospective of three decades worth of motoring highlights and lowlights.

The XJS is, of course, most famous for its V12. Alas, I drove the lesser 4.0-liter inline six-cylinder, which runs so quietly I couldn't tell when I should let off the starter. It didn't honestly get much louder as I pulled out onto the Goodwood Circuit and began to wind everything up to speed.

Goodwood is a generally simple track but a beautifully flowing one, mostly a series of multi-apex right-handers perfectly designed for machines with simple suspension and rudimentary brakes. These are descriptors that can certainly be applied to the XJS.

Turn that lacquered steering wheel to enter a corner, and there's a good moment or two where nothing at all happens. Be patient, though, and the long nose eventually begins its journey toward the inside of the turn. An instant later, the outside door of the car initiates its own trip down towards the asphalt.

Again, “relaxed” is the way to describe it, with the XJS leaning and meandering through the turns without much in the way of hurry or feedback. The brake pedal likewise has a long throw to it, and you'd best get used to exploring every degree of it if you want to bring this big cabriolet down to a reasonable speed before turn-in.

At first I couldn't help laughing at how unsuited the car felt at speed, but after a lap I started getting comfortable. Again, thanks to the flowing nature of this track, the flowing nature of the XJS was quite enjoyable. The challenge was to pick a given amount of steering input early into one corner and hold it all the way through the apexes so as not to upset the suspension.

Holding a consistent, steady line is the way, and when following a gentle gliding arc like that, the XJS is surprisingly fun. Then, once I learned to get the throttle buried to the floor a good few seconds before the apex, I started to enjoy the inline-six a bit, too.

When it finally works its way towards the upper end of its 5,700-rpm tachometer, it offers decent shove and a nice sound, too. I could just hear the engine over the wind noise, though, which, despite keeping the roof up, was louder than many modern convertibles I've driven with the top down.

So, not ideal for a technical track (but who’s bringing an XJS to one of those?), and that relaxed transmission and power delivery likewise will leave you a bit frustrated if you're the sort who gets impatient running between traffic lights. But on a wide, flowing road with lots of miles ahead of you, I could see the XJS being a genuinely rewarding ride.

A little buyer's advice

Looking to bring an XJS into your life? The good news is you've got 21 years' worth of cars to choose from. But you're most likely to find a cleanest example among the later generation, like you see here, which ran from 1991 to 1996.

There are two engines to choose from: the 4.0-liter inline six driven here and the V12, which evolved from 5.3 to 6.0 liters. Which one is for you? That depends on whether you want to maximize reliability or number of moving pieces. Regardless, don't imagine that you're getting yourself a hot rod even if you go with the bigger motor. At its peak, that V12 made just over 300 horsepower, about 60 more than the inline-six. These days, neither is going to feel like a rocket ship.

Per Hagerty, a 1996 inline-six convertible like you see here is worth $15,500 in good condition. Want a V12? You're looking at $18,000 in the same condition. Just make sure to budget a little extra for maintenance. As ever, it helps if you're handy yourself, as issues with the car's electrical system, rear suspension and fuel system are common, and your friendly local mechanic will surely roll out their premium rates when they see you cruise up in one of these.