Category: Polestar

2024 Polestar 4 First Drive Review: No looking back

Ronan Glon

Ronan Glon

View the 74 images of this gallery on the original article

MADRID, Spain — Historically, carmakers have used windows as a selling point when there are more of them than you might expect. Volkswagen’s 23-window Bus, which was officially known as the Deluxe Microbus with Samba Package, was an upmarket trim that’s highly sought-after today, for example. On the other side of the pond, the flagship Citroën XM was available with a 13th window that kept wind out of the cabin when the hatch was open. With the 4, Polestar argues the industry has reached peak window.

As far as eccentricities go, the lack of a rear window isn’t a minor one. We’re not talking about a van you’d see in a contractor’s fleet; this is a premium EV. There’s more to it than a glass-less hatch, however. After driving a pre-production car on a test track, I’m taking the 4 out on public roads.

First, a word about positioning. Don’t read too much into the “4” nameplate; Polestar names its cars in the order that they’re launched in. The 4 is, quite simply, the fourth Polestar model unveiled, and it’s positioned below the 3 in terms of pricing and size. The segment it competes in is relatively hard to pin down. It’s an SUV in the same sense that a taco is a sandwich: it ticks most of the right boxes on paper but it doesn’t really look the part. It’s more of a tall-ish sedan-hatchback mash-up. Or, maybe a crossover in the literal sense of the term rather than in the commonly accepted sense.

Regardless, the 4 certainly turns heads. There’s nothing else quite like it on the road. It falls in line with Polestar’s design language by adopting styling cues like T-shaped headlights, a grille-less front end and a thin rear light bar, but it’s not a photocopy of an existing model. It has its own identity.

Polestar claims that it has a very good reason for leaving out the rear window. “We wanted to have a coupe body style for aerodynamics and at the same time get a really spacious interior,” Maximilian Missoni, the brand’s head of design, told me. The window-less solution made it possible to shift the D-pillar back and gain a few inches. “Another problem with coupes is that [in the rear-view mirror] you see a lot of your own interior – you see the headrests and maybe your passengers,” he added.

The sheetmetal hides the modular SEA architecture shared with several other brands in the Geely empire. Versions of this basic platform underpin the Volvo EM90 minivan sold in China, the Volvo EX30 and the Lotus Eletre, among other models. Buyers will have two configurations to choose from at launch. The base model is called Long Range Single Motor, and it ships with — you guessed it — a single electric motor that zaps the rear wheels into motion. It’s rated at 272 horsepower and 253 pound-feet of torque, and it’s equipped with a 100-kilowatt-hour lithium-ion battery pack.

Next up is the Long Range Dual Motor, which gets two motors (one per axle) for through-the-road all-wheel-drive. The second motor increases horsepower and torque to 544 and 506, respectively. This trim uses the same battery as the rear-wheel-drive version. Both drivetrains are built around a 400-volt electrical system, and range checks in at up to 300 miles with rear-wheel drive or up to 270 miles with all-wheel drive. Charging from 10% to 80% takes about 30 minutes with a 200-kilowatt charger.

The 4 shares about 85% of its infotainment system with the 3, but the software is displayed on a portrait-oriented 14.5-inch touchscreen instead of on a landscape-oriented one. The system is Android-based, and Polestar designed the user interface in-house with clear, easy-to-read icons and a split-screen functionality. The driver can notably select the ratio of the split; you can display the navigation system on the left 3/4s of the screen and show the media and phone widgets on the right 1/4, for example. Vice versa works, too, as does a 50/50 split. This cool feature makes the system more intuitive and less distracting to use. “We are not developing phones. We are making cars, and we have distractions to worry about,” Ruben Rodriguez, the company’s head of UX design, told me.

Like the 3, the 4 follows a minimalist approach to interior design. You’ll find very few buttons in the cabin. There are a handful on the steering wheel, they’re notably used for functions like adjusting the door mirrors and the steering column, and a volume knob on the wide, slanted center console. This extensive reliance on the touchscreen could catch old-school drivers off guard, but it’s increasingly becoming par for the course across the industry. Touchscreens can also add a touch of novelty to the experience: Polestar named the ambient lighting modes after the planets in the solar system, and you can poke your way through the galaxy while learning details like the length of a day on Mars.

My time behind the wheel was limited to the dual-motor version, and my test car was equipped with the optional Performance Pack. It doesn’t increase horsepower but it adds specific chassis tuning, 22-inch wheels wrapped by Pirelli P-Zero tires, Brembo brakes and gold-colored seatbelts. The huge brakes aren’t overkill: This is a roughly 5,200-pound car that gets from zero to 60 miles per hour in 3.8 seconds.

Performance is the 4’s dominant trait, at least in this configuration. It feels even quicker than the 3.8-second figure suggests thanks to the instant torque delivered by the electric motor, and the relatively low center of gravity combined with the 50/50 weight distribution give it better handling than you’d assume considering its size and weight. It’s not as sharp around a bend as the 3, which has a trick torque-vectoring rear axle, but the effort Polestar put into making the 4 engaging to drive shows. 

Unlike the 3, which rides on an air suspension system, the 4 features a conventional steel setup. It’s fixed in the rear-wheel-drive model and adaptive in the all-wheel-drive model. The latter gives the driver three modes called Standard, Nimble and Firm, respectively, to choose from. The same menu in the touchscreen also lets you select two types of power delivery (Range and Performance), three flavors of steering feel (Light, Standard and Firm), and three levels of one-pedal driving (Off, Low and Standard). By playing around with these settings you can create a tailor-made driving profile. The difference between these various settings is perceptible even in normal driving conditions. Hitting the suspension’s Firm setting reduces body roll at the expense of smoothness, while the steering gets noticeably heavier in Firm mode. You can guess which mode you’re in without looking at the screen.

Select the softer suspension and steering settings and the 4 becomes a comfortable place to travel in. Missoni’s words ring true: There’s a ton of space in both rows. Was that worth sacrificing the rear window for? It depends on your perspective. At its core, there’s nothing terribly unusual or alarming about the new system. Developed by Michigan-based Gentex, it consists of a 2.5-megapixel camera integrated into a little alcove on the roof that sends footage to an 8.9-inch digital rear-view mirror. You can flip down the mirror to take a look at which kid is throwing the punches in the back seat.

Our experience with camera-based mirrors has been mixed. One of my colleagues ran into glare-related issues with a similar system in the Volvo C40. I didn’t experience anything like that in the 4, but I thought the mirror was positioned too far back. I’d have moved it a few inches toward the windshield. Ultimately, it’s a matter of preference — that’s often the case with new technology. You might hate it, or you might love it. The problem is that if you hate it, you don’t have a second choice. It’s not like you can pay Polestar an extra $1,000 to order a 4 with a rear window and a real mirror.

So, have we reached peak window? The industry will decide. In a decade, the 4 will either stand out as a real oddball or as a trendsetter. Until then, it’s one of the more distinctive EVs on the market.

Polestar will initially build the 4 in Hangzhou Bay, China, though the model will also be manufactured in Busan, South Korea, starting in 2025. Pricing starts at $56,300 (including the $1,400 destination charge) for the rear-wheel-drive model and $64,300 for the two-motor all-wheel-drive version.

2025 Polestar 3 First Drive Review: Aiming at the mainstream

Ronan Glon

Ronan Glon

View the 59 images of this gallery on the original article

MADRID, Spain — Polestar has catered to a niche audience since taking a seat at the carmaker table in 2017. Things started small: It’s been operating as a one-model brand for the past couple of years. While the 2 set a high bar, it’s not able to push the tuner-turned-manufacturer into the mainstream alone.

Backup has arrived. Unveiled in 2022, the Polestar 3 will plant the flag in the oh-so-important (and oh-so-lucrative) SUV segment. It also blazes the path that the next additions to the range will follow, both in terms of design and technology. For many, this big EV will be the face of Polestar.

I’ve already driven the 3 on a test track in Sweden. Now it’s time to hit the open road.

Like the segment-bending Polestar 4, the 3 illustrates how Polestar plans to gradually distance itself from Volvo. It’s built on the same modular SPA2 platform as the EX90, which will be sold alongside the XC90 for at least a little while, but the two SUVs look and feel different. They’re cousins rather than siblings. The 3 is marketed as the sportier of the two, so it features a more swept-back silhouette, a lower roofline and only two rows of seats. The EX90 is boxier, taller and available with a third row.

The idea wasn’t to fully sever ties with Volvo. “We like to keep a little bit of a bridge to Volvo as a family because there is a lot to gain,” Maximilian Missoni, head of Polestar’s design department, told me. Drivers tend to trust Volvo, especially when it comes to safety. “The connection to Volvo is a good thing; it sets Polestar apart from many other newcomers that don’t have this kind of trust.”

Up front, the Thor’s Hammer daytime running lights form a link between the two companies. There’s plenty of unique Polestar DNA, though. The 3 doesn’t hide its armada of sensors; it proudly shows them off. The panel located between the headlights — where you’d likely find a grille if the 3 used, say, a straight-six — features lines indicating the position of the various sensors that power the electronic driving aids.

In a way, this is Polestar’s heritage. The Polestar 1, its first model, ushered in this labeling system with a cool, transparent panel in the trunk. It explained the purpose of the big orange wires linked to the battery.

You get a stronger whiff of Volvo-ness from the driver’s seat. The three-spoke steering wheel, the digital instrument cluster, the dashboard’s overall layout and the floating center console look similar to what you find in the EX90. Polestar stresses that it went to significant lengths to differentiate its software, however. While the infotainment system remains Android-based and displayed on a 14.5-inch touchscreen, the brand designed its own user interface loaded with proprietary fonts and icons.

About 85% of the 3’s infotainment system is shared with the 4. The biggest difference is that the 3’s touchscreen is portrait-oriented while the 4’s is landscape. Ruben Rodriguez, the company’s head of UX design, told me that’s because the 4 is aimed at younger buyers who will appreciate the extra functions, like a split-screen mode. In contrast, 3 buyers will prefer the top-to-bottom display.

This software relies on tiles and illustrations to clearly convey information, which is good considering the long list of functions packed into the screen. Beyond the usual, such as entering an address into the navigation system or changing the radio station, the touchscreen is your point of contact to open the glovebox, select whether the door mirrors fold automatically or adjust the steering column.

Rear-seat passengers will likely feel the urge to send Polestar a heartfelt “thank you” card after a long trip. By detouring a three-row configuration, designers had the freedom to move the rear bench back to carve out a generous amount of legroom. Storage capacity takes a hit, however: There’s 21.1 cubic feet of cargo space (including 3.2 cubes under the floor) with the second-row seats left up, and 49.8 cubic feet with the rear seats folded flat. It’s not hard to find a rival with a bigger trunk. Staying in the (extended) family, the XC60 offers more trunk space, yet it’s about eight inches shorter than the Polestar 3.

At launch, the Long-Range Dual-Motor will be the only variant of the 3 available. Its name is straightforward: Power comes from two electric motors (one per axle) that draw electricity from a 111-kilowatt-hour nickel-manganese-cobalt battery. The system’s output checks in at 489 horsepower and 620 pound-feet of torque, though the optional Performance Package bumps those figures to 517 hp and 671 lb-ft, respectively. While the 3 isn’t light —  it weighs between 5,696 and 5,886 pounds depending on how it’s configured — the huge amount of power unlocks hot-hatch-like acceleration: Polestar quotes a 4.8-second 0-60-mph time for the standard 3 and 4.5 seconds for the Performance model.

However, there’s no shortage of electric cars that post the kind of horsepower and torque figures that were par for the course in the supercar segment a decade ago. And, most of them use the same basic drivetrain configuration — a single-speed transmission for each motor and a heavy battery under the cabin — so they all have some similar driving characteristics. This is where the 3 stands out from the pack.

It’s all in the rear axle: Polestar added a dual-clutch torque-vectoring differential to dial in sharper handling. It’s not merely a marketing gimmick. This system makes a big difference on a twisty road, where the 3 handles like a nimbler car. It’s not, say, a Volkswagen GTI, but it’s far more engaging to drive than its weight and proportions suggest. One of the best-driving EVs on the market is a 192.9-inch-long SUV built by a company few had heard of 10 years ago – how’s that for beating the odds?

Several other factors come into play, including a low center of gravity and a 50/50 front/rear weight distribution that allow the 3 to take a corner without excessive body roll. You can also configure the steering (Light, Standard and Firm) and the adaptive air suspension (Standard, Nimble and Firm). Playing around with these profiles makes a perceptible difference in how the 3 behaves. Nearly every new car offers driving modes or profiles, but they’re often not as nuanced as we’d like them to be.

Brakes? They’re there, and they’re huge — we’re talking four-piston Brembo calipers up front — but you likely won’t use them often. The pads only come in contact with the rotors at 0.3g's of braking force. Below that, the regenerative braking system slows the 3 on its own. The pedal feel is average. It’s not great, but it’s not overly video game-like, either. You can one-pedal-drive your way down the road by selecting two levels called Low and Standard, respectively (you can also turn the system off).

The Eau de Volvo scent returns on the highway, where the 3 cruises in comfort and relative silence, though there’s wind noise coming from the door mirror area. The driving aids work as advertised, and the 3 is notably capable of changing lanes on its own with a flick of the turn signal. The rear axle that orchestrates the amount of power assigned to each rear wheel on a twisty road goes offline for efficiency’s sake on the highway to save range. Going straight at 65 mph, you don’t feel that the rear wheels aren’t powered. I’m told the system reengages them almost instantly if needed.

Polestar notes that the 3’s 400-volt electrical system is capable of 250-kilowatt charging, which can take the battery from 10% to 80% in 30 minutes. The brand is working on faster charging —  it built a prototype capable of charging from 10% to 80% in 10 minutes — but the technology isn’t ready. The 3 gets an EPA-estimated 315 miles of range, though the Performance Pack lowers that figure to 279.

With a fresh approach to design, a nice interior and engaging handling, the 3 should allow Polestar to shed its new-kid-on-the-block status. It’s different enough from the Volvo EX90 to stand out in a crowded segment, but it’s also similar enough to address concerns that motorists might have about buying a car from a young brand.

On sale now, the 2025 Polestar 3 starts at $74,800, including a $1,400 destination charge. Adding the Performance Pack increases that figure to $80,800. Note that the model is not eligible for the $7,500 federal tax credit because it’s built in Chengdu, China. Polestar will begin building the 3 in the Volvo plant near Charleston, South Carolina, at some point in 2024, so American-made cars could qualify. In the meantime, the automaker points out that buyers who lease the 3 can claim the full $7,500 tax credit.

And, hang tight if you want a cheaper 3: there’s a rear-wheel-drive model due out later in 2024.

Related video: