Category: Hybrid

2025 Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E Performance First Drive: The GT 63, but more

View the 23 images of this gallery on the original article

STUTTGART, Germany – Something of a hierarchy becomes apparent while cruising on unrestricted sections of the Autobahn. Humble little hatchbacks from Renault and Volkswagen give way to their hot hatch counterparts with Rs and Ss on the tailgates. Those then make room for more serious sedans and coupes from BMW and Mercedes. And at the top of the food chain, an Autobahn apex predator if there ever was one, the car I’m in: the (deep breath) 2025 Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E Performance.

It only takes a portion of the coupe’s monumental 805 horsepower and 1,047 pound-feet of torque for it to assert its dominance. I don’t even take it out of Comfort mode. A little prod of pedal, some modest rumble from the V8, and the AMG starts racking up kilometers per hour. And no matter who’s ahead of me, I can always stay close, sending the clear message that I can go faster and I want to go faster.

Pleasantly, the GT is comfy. Sure, it’s a little on the firm side, even when compared to its near-twin the SL, but it’s steady and relaxed. The optional performance seats cradle you deep in the leather-lined interior, providing both comfort and support for dominating the highway. Chrome and ambient lighting shine around vents and screens. It really offers about everything you’d want from a sporty grand tourer.

But the thing is, so can the other Mercedes-AMG GTs. They’re also fast, sleek and comfortable. Not quite as fast, but I only managed to get this plug-in hybrid GT to 150 mph before running into too much traffic to go faster, and any of the others can do that. What does the E Performance have that the others don’t?

Mainly, it has bragging rights.

It sure seems like the main reason to get the (another deep breath) Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E Performance is because it’s currently the most GT you can get, in length of name and performance. We already touched on the huge output, and that power and torque makes the all-wheel E Performance the quickest production Mercedes ever built with a 0-60 mph time of 2.7 seconds. That’s even quicker than the AMG One hypercar. It ekes out a few more mph of top speed over its GT 63 counterpart, too, at 199 (said regular GT 63 hits 196). And to scrub off speed, it gets standard carbon ceramic brakes that are 1.1-inch bigger up front (16.5) and 0.8 inch larger in the rear (15).

The huge power boost, and the name, comes from the E Performance plug-in hybrid system that adds a 6.1-kilowatt-hour battery pack and a 201-horsepower permanent-magnet electric motor to power the rear axle through a a two-speed transmission (though the rear motor can still power all four wheels by sending power forward through the same driveshaft that brings engine power to the back). Despite the two-speed transmission for the electric motor, you’d never notice that there’s an extra little gearbox. Any shifting is imperceptible. It’s also impressive how smooth the transition between full-electric and hybrid operation is.

Besides adding performance, it literally adds more to the car, which is mainly noticeable in how it fills up a chunk of the GT’s generously sized cargo area. There’s still plenty of space left over, and it doesn’t intrude upon (struggles to maintain a straight face) rear “seat” “room.” It adds more weight, as well. Mercedes doesn’t say exactly how much, but apparently, it’s enough to give the E Performance a more even mass distribution.

The electric motor opens up some interesting possibilities for the E Performance that could further enhance its abilities beyond numbers, but it doesn’t really follow through with them. It’s literally a plug-in hybrid, but its usefulness as one is debatable. It only goes 8 miles on electric power, but that’s on the ultra-optimistic European WLTP cycle. That might make for stealthy cruising through quiet villages or avoiding European urban congestion charges, but it feels weird to pay for 800 horsepower and only use 200 of it. It’s certainly plenty for poking around town, though setting foot on the freeway will quickly expose the limits of the motor, and when doing so, you’re bound to push past the extra resistance in the pedal that reactivates the engine. The four regenerative braking modes – including a one-pedal mode – also seem a bit pointless as they can only be accessed when the battery is empty enough (a common element of battery-powered vehicles that’s usually not that big of a deal); the battery then fills up quite rapidly given its small capacity, especially in Sport and Race modes where the engine pitches in to top up electricity for max performance.

Meanwhile, much of the rest of the E Performance remains comparable to a regular GT 63. They both come with rear-axle steering, active roll stabilization, and mostly the same style. The E Performance’s main visual distinctions are fender badges, red highlights on the rear nameplate, and the charging door on the rear bumper. The standard wheel sizes are even the same.

Ultimately, the E Performance is just more. It’s not better. It’s not worse, either. It’s just more.  Arguably, this end of the market is more concerned with more than anything else, but truthfully you can get basically the same experience with the other V8 GTs. Those are already more capable than any public road can really accommodate – be it in Germany or most definitely back in the United States. As for possible track use, Mercedes sure doesn’t seem to look at the S E Performance as a track car, since we didn't get to try it on track. This is also after we were told this next-generation GT was going to go in the sportier, track-oriented direction when the SL debuted seeming awfully similar in concept to the existing GT. Also pointing more to a focus on comfort over performance is in the steering, which is a bit numb and disconnected, and generally lacking its predecessor’s raw and visceral feel. It’s too cool, collected and distant. Here’s hoping the GT 63 Pro will actually prove to be AMG’s track-ready answer to the 911 GT3.

If all this feels awfully negative for an 805-horsepower GT car, well, it’s all just a matter of perspective. The GT 63 S E Performance is by no means a bad car. All that power is obviously fun, and the car is unquestionably capable. The V8 really sounds superb, too – it has a deep, clear rumble, and Race mode adds just the right amount of modest crackle on the overrun. The new GT is also gorgeous with its long nose and curvy rear end; it’s better proportioned than the nose-heavy previous model, too. The trouble is, all that applies to “lesser” GT models, and although pricing has yet to be announced, one seriously doubts the S E Performance will command a small price premium. Maybe buyers of six-figure sports cars don’t care so much for value, but we do, and it’s hard not to see this plug-in hybrid GT’s as questionable.

Hyundai Santa Fe Calligraphy Interior Review: More functional than fancy

The new Hyundai Santa Fe boasts a controversial design on the outside that definitely won't be for everyone (I'm all for it, but can see how the Minecraft Ford Flex aesthetic is a bit weird). The interior is less polarizing. The design is certainly on the blocky side itself, and doesn't have the more organic and luxury-adjacent vibe of the Palisade, but its technology, switchgear and overall materials quality all speak to a premium environment. I don't think it's as luxe as the Palisade Calligraphy with its quilted leather and silver switchgear, but it certainly has the luxury feature content to back it up. I'll be touching on those features a bit in this interior review, but I'll mostly be focusing on this interior's impressive functionality, much of which is common throughout the Santa Fe lineup.

Let's talk about storage, as the Santa Fe has a lot of it. There is the typical drop-down glovebox, but just above that is a little shelf to put whatever. I'd say a phone, but the center console has your passenger covered for that (more on that in a moment).  

Above, you'll see there is a second glovebox hidden behind the pleather-covered trim panel. Apparently, as this is a Calligraphy, it has a UV Sanitizer inside meant to kill germs on whatever you put in there. I sadly did not have a petri dish on hand to see how effective it is. I guess this is a good thing? At the very least, it's something I've never come across before.

Speaking of which, I don't remember coming across a double-opening center armrest bin like this. Lots flip left or right, but this one has access buttons on both ends. Why do you want it to open the other way?

So those in the back can get access, that's why. They also have a handy pull out bin. 

Moving back up front, there is a now-common under console storage area. It has a rubberized floor to prevent whatever from sliding around.

Here's another novelty. Though not strictly unique, having two wireless charge pads in a car is exceedingly rare. These are right-smack in the middle of the center console and you can see they feature little platforms that let the outer edges of your phone have access to air rather than suffocating against rubber. 

You can also see the primary cupholders here, which were big enough to hold my wine-bottle-sized water bottle. 

Moving into the back, there are additional cupholders in the doors. I'm a big fan of this feature, mostly because I can put my son's daily water bottle for school right next to him where I can't possibly miss it when getting him out of the car. 

The hourglass shape allows for two cups or bottles, but is also intended to keep a phone on its side somewhat secure. 

In this photo, you can also see that the Calligraphy has heated second-row seats. So does the Limited. 

The front seat backs have little hooks and some Minecrafty embossments to spruce up what would otherwise be hard plastic. And before you complain about that hard plastic, I'd offer this is better to meet a kid's dirty shoes than leather/pleather.

As shown in the Santa Fe Luggage Test, there is some underfloor storage behind the third row, but it's indeed more "storage" than an expansion of the cargo area.

Let's talk about the seats. These are exclusive to the Calligraphy: the "Relaxation Comfort" seat first seen in the Hyundai Ioniq 5 Limited. I like them because of how high you can arch up the front of the seat bottom and dive the back of it -- I'm 6-foot-3, and sitting like this lets me sit closer to the wheel while providing under-thigh support and taking pressure off my lower back. A fellow editor once dubbed this "the birthing position." Porsche seats can often do this, as could BMW seats in the 2000s. 

For everyone else, putting this feature in the Santa Fe feels more like a "hey, why not?" feature. The Ioniq 5 has it, apparently, for relaxing while your car charges. You don't have to do that with the Santa Fe. Waiting for the kids to come out of school, maybe? Whatever, let's just go with "good for tall people."

The second-row captain's chairs in the Calligraphy are partially power-operated. They still slide fore-aft by pulling up on a bar and then moving the seat the old-fashioned way, or by pressing the quick-release button that slides it forward for third-row access. 

Recline and seat-bottom tilt are then handled with electric motors. This is great for comfort, but impedes third-row access by making it ... really ... slow ... to ... put ... the seatback ... back. A common issue with power-operated second-row seats. 

You can lower the second-row seatbacks with these buttons in the cargo area.

This is the third row. The seat is obviously quite flat, and it's quite close to the floor. You will be more comfortable in a Palisade, regardless of how big you are. That said, scooting the second row up to free up some extra space for those in the third row still leaves plenty of space for those sitting in the second (even with a tall driver up front). Also note how much headroom there is thanks to that boxy roofline, which also contributes to big, square quarter windows that makes it feel airier and more spacious than is typical. 

Speaking of airy, the Limited and Calligraphy have a dual-pane sunroof.

Back to the third row, which has air vents, hourglass double cupholders and a USB-C port on each side, plus a rear A/C fan control. The right side also has the 115-volt house-style electrical outlet that's more of a cargo feature.

The second row has sunshades in the Calligraphy. I think these should be standard in every family vehicle. 

Now let's move up front and talk about technology and controls.

This has basically the same shifter design as the Ioniq 5 and 6. Twist forward for drive, backward for reverse and press the button on the end of it for park. 

I have a tendency to want to do the opposite as the shifter's monostable functionality is generally similar to center console electronic shifters that do forward for reverse and back for drive (see BMW). 

There are different gauge layouts available, tied to drive mode if you'd like, but I just stuck with these. They are clean, easily read and go with the rest of the interior.

The Santa Fe has the same row of infotainment shortcuts as the Ioniq 5 N (which has removed the old Radio shortcut button for Search, booooooo), but it has more climate controls. Specifically, "buttons" for heated seats, ventilated seats and heated steering wheel. You don't have to wait for the infotainment system to clear a lawyer screen, press a general seat/wheel button and then do something on the screen. That's annoying. This isn't.

Also note that the mechanically related Kia Sorento has these rows of infotainment and climate controls integrated into a common housing and flips back and forth between them. This is better than that.

You can also see the big Drive Mode toggle here. Can't say I was inspired to press that in a Hyundai Santa Fe. 

Oh, you can also see the little button for killing the gunk on your phone with UV-C.

The Limited and Calligraphy have multi-color ambient lighting. There are 10 preferred choices with snazzy names, or you can go beyond that with a larger color wheel. My son demanded pink per usual.

And finally, the infotainment system, because it pisses me off. This is Hyundai/Kia's newest system and I don't like what they've done. I DO like that it no longer defaults onto a nothing page with some scenery on it every time you turn the car on, and the shortcuts along the bottom are fine. 

I listen to satellite radio, though, and what they've done to its interface is nonsensical. Since Sirius and XM debuted in cars nearly 20 years ago, a defining feature has been being able to see what song is playing. Furthermore, you've usually been able to see that information at the same time as your favorites list. That functionality is increasingly going away and I do not understand it. The Hyundai/Kia system is yet another culprit after previously doing Sirius XM controls totally normal and very well. 

Look above left. The currently selected station, Alt Nation, is indicated in three different places: highlighted in the channel list, shown as a thumbnail at the right, and in the lower right hand corner with its station number, SXM 36. The only thing indicating what song is playing is the tiny thumbnail of album art, as if anyone is supposed to know what the hell that is. This is barely better than the plain-old radio face plate in my 25-year-old BMW that just says "FM 106.7."

To find out what son is playing, you have to press that tiny thumbnail of album art. This takes over the entire damn screen (above right), and although you can now see the song info, it's in small font in the lower right hand corner. VW and BMW now do this full-screen takeover, and I don't get it. It makes you got back and forth, back and forth ...

Oh, but can't you use the split-screen functionality to show song info, you know, exactly where that Alt Nation logo is in the above left photo?

NO! I can't fathom why Hyundai/Kia got rid of the option for seeing entertainment info in the split screen view. This is particularly helpful when using the native navigation system, or as some cars let you do, with Apple CarPlay.

In the new Hyundai/Kia system, split screen content lets you see a map on top of a map, the weather forecast, or my personal favorite, extremely detailed geographic coordinates just in case you need to call in a missile strike on yourself. 

This obviously drives me bonkers. Why, Hyundai, why???

At this point, I can already hear people saying "Whatever, I just use Apple CarPlay." Well then, here, it has it, and the shortcut buttons make it easy to escape. 

Hyundai/Kia has also maintained the little star button, which is customizable for access any number of options. I set it for phone projection, granting quick access to Apple CarPlay at the push of a button. Again, I can no longer press a Radio button to easily get back to that screwy radio screen, but don't worry, I have easy access to Search for something. What, I don't know. "Hey Hyundai, why is your radio UI terrible now?"

So, obviously, I'm no fan of the infotainment system changes, but everything else about the Santa Fe's interior functionality is very impressive. 

2024 Mazda CX-90 Long-Term Update: Summer Camping Trip

2024 Mazda CX-90

Greg Migliore

2024 Mazda CX-90

Greg Migliore

View the 14 images of this gallery on the original article

HESSEL, Mich. — For the past decade, my family has kicked off summer with an extended camping weekend in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, a largely raw and uncut part of the lower 48 states surrounded by the Great Lakes, Canada and Wisconsin. It’s four to five hours on Interstate 75 from Metro Detroit, and once there, it’s best to have most of the things you need, though there are a reasonable amount of grocery stories, bars and ice cream stands. This camping trip has served as a litmus test of sorts for most of the recent Autoblog long-termers, especially the larger ones. While I’ve had issues with our 2024 Mazda CX-90’s plug-in hybrid powertrain, the SUV came through with flying colors fulfilling its core mission as a versatile family hauler.

The trip begins with packing, and the CX-90 easily swallowed a cooler, sleeping bags, fishing poles, a large tent, boxes of food, two suitcases, a duffle bag and all sorts of other supplies. I could still see out the back window, which isn’t always the case on these adventures. Had I taken my golf clubs and an inflatable kayak, it might have been less comfortable. Still, the manifest was robust, and the Mazda was up for it.

Early the following day we set off, two adults, one child and a large golden retriever. The drive Up North, as we Michiganders say, was uneventful. The CX-90 is a solid expressway cruiser, generally quiet and comfortable. The steering is weightier and more precise than comparable SUVs. By now I’m used to, and mostly enjoy, the engagement during the long drive. The adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist and blind-spot monitoring were helpful aids and I’ve come to expect the help for long road trips in vehicles at this price point. 

Good luck finding an EV charger in the part of the U.P. where we camped, but running just on premium fuel, we averaged 24.5 mpg, including one 341-mile stint where we logged 26.7 mpg, the second-best figure in the CX-90’s four-month Autoblog career. I still prefer Mazda’s turbo straight six-cylinder engine to this unit, the company’s first plug-in hybrid powertrain. The hybrid’s acceleration is hampered by an uneven partnership with the eight-speed automatic transmission. Despite the 323 horses and 369 lb-ft, the system doesn’t reach the full potential these figures imply.

Once there, we slept on the ground for three cool, wet nights and enjoyed four sunny hot days filled with swimming, fishing and other outdoor activities. By the end of it, the Mazda was covered in dirt and sand inside and out. This trip is always hard on the test cars, and this is about as grimy as we've gotten one. I spent a good chunk of the following Monday morning vacuuming sand and dog fur (see the pictures and you can imagine just how much dog fur was in the car) from every orifice. I even felt the need to bust out some Meguiar’s to put a shine on the dashboard and leather seats.

So, where does the CX-90 rank among my U.P. people haulers? It’s up against legendary long-termers like the 2014 VW Golf GTI, 2018 Chrysler Pacifica hybrid, 2019 Subaru Forester, 2021 Hyundai Palisade and 2023 Toyota Sienna. I also took a blacked-out 2017 Chevy Tahoe up there, slept in it for two nights and got a speeding ticket. Good times.

I’m putting the Mazda behind the Chrysler and Toyota minivans, which is a bit unfair, given the supreme functionality most minivans offer due to their layout. I also preferred the overall vibe of the Palisade and its light, airy interior, though the Mazda has been considerably more fuel efficient, leaving them in a dead heat in my book. The Forester was great, but it was only charged with a shorter hunting trip, and its main accomplishment was plowing through snow (not insignificant) and serving as a comfortable ride home after a chilly weekend in the woods. The Golf GTI was a clown car, filled to the brim with three adults and so much stuff the doors could barely close.

Tied for third in this least-scientific automotive comparison test? Not bad for the Mazda CX-90. It was a good trip, and the SUV lived up to its billing as a sporty three-row crossover with style and function. No new flaws emerged, and despite its uneven driving character I generally enjoyed my trip behind the wheel. It passed the U.P. Family Camping Test in all the ways that count. Hopefully the sand will come out by the end of summer.