Category: First Drives

2024 Audi Q6 and SQ6 E-Tron First Drive Review: E-Tron legacy

Audi

Audi

View the 20 images of this gallery on the original article

Bilbao, SPAIN — Audi has enjoyed a head start in the EV space since the first E-Tron SUV debuted in 2019 (it's now called the Q8 E-Tron), followed by the Porsche-related E-Tron GT sedan and VW-based Q4 E-Tron SUV a few years later. Not surprisingly given its name/number, the latest addition fills the space between the two SUVs with the 2025 Audi Q6 E-Tron. Arriving stateside at the end of 2024, the Q6 follows the even-number naming convention for EVs, with odd numbers now reserved for the remaining internal combustion vehicles in the pipeline.

I hopped on a plane to Spain to put the Q6 E-Tron through its paces, as well as the spicier SQ6 E-Tron, which will be arriving at the same time. Both are built on the Premium Platform Electric (PPE) that's shared with the new all-electric Porsche Macan. This platform utilizes an 800-volt architecture that has been thoroughly tweaked to squeeze the last bit of efficiency from the lithium-ion batteries, and you can read into the hows and whys in our Tech Deep Dive.

As far as overall specs go, both Q6 and SQ6 E-Trons draw power from a 100-kilowatt-hour battery pack in the floor, of which 94.4 kWh are usable. AC charge rates top out at 9.6 kW (many EVs manage 11 kW), but DC fast-charging has an impressive maximum of 270 kW. That's good enough to replenish the battery from 10-80% in 21 minutes if you can find a charger that is fully functional. The DC charge port is on the driver side, but you can use an AC charger on either side, which should come in handy in your driveway/garage.

The Q6 E-Tron comes standard with two motors for all-wheel drive. Combined output is 422 horsepower under normal conditions, and up to 456 hp in launch mode. Curiously, the European versions are limited to 382 hp, but they also get the rear-drive-only model that should return additional range. It seems likely that the rear-drive model will be available in the U.S. in the future, but Audi will neither confirm nor deny those plans. Speaking of range, the Q6 Quattro that we get is estimated to return 307 miles on a single charge with the standard 19-inch wheels. In my experience, electric Audis have tended to exceed estimates by 20 or 30 miles without even trying.

The SQ6 E-Tron is good for 483 hp nominally and 509 hp in launch mode. As you'd expect, it also gets a sportier suspension and upgraded brakes. That range estimate also drops to 276 miles. Audi expects it will reach 60 miles per hour in 4.1 seconds, compared to the Q6's 4.9-second sprint. Prices aren't yet available, but looking at the current lineup and the existing European listings, I'd expect the Q6 E-Tron to start around $65,000 or $70,000. That could place the SQ6 in the $85,000 neighborhood.

My drive started in the Q6 E-Tron all-wheel-drive, but with the Euro-spec 382-hp output. On a mix of city, curvy and highway roads, I never missed the extra oomph we get. It's plenty powerful when you need it, though it'll lose in a drag race against many other EVs. No big deal, since I doubt most electric SUV shoppers are showing up to the local quarter-mile strip, anyway. The Q6 stands out from other E-Trons as it's the first to offer one-pedal driving. Tugging the gear selector down into the B mode activates it, but those with experience in other EVs will notice that the brake regeneration is still much less aggressive. That means you might have to brush the brake pedal to keep from tapping the bumper in front of you, at least until you get used to the gentler deceleration.

More importantly, the Q6 is effortless and easy. It glides down the road silently and smoothly, yet remains confident in the curves. It will corner with more athleticism than 95% of typical drivers will ever likely desire, or about half of Autoblog readers.

Audi

View the 18 images of this gallery on the original article

The SQ6 E-Tron is definitely a better choice for spirited pilots. It feels substantially sportier in every dynamic measure, yet it doesn't significantly degrade comfort (even in the firmer Sport mode). That was evident in the first roundabout as it carved a beautiful S-curve with noticeably less body roll. There was also less nosedive under braking and squat when getting back on the power. That's impressive when you consider you're tossing around almost 5,300 pounds. This is definitely the driver's choice between the two, but it's not as bonkers as some other higher-performing electric SUVs.

For those wanting something even spicier, an RS Q6 E-Tron is already in the works. With any luck, that top model will arrive in the following year, perhaps with some Sportback variants in tow. My wild guesstimation is hoping for 600-plus horsepower, 60 mph in 3-ish seconds, and a lower and firmer suspension. Looking at the Porsche Macan Turbo's specs, that doesn't seem out of the question, nor does a six-figure price tag. I'd also expect some styling and aerodynamic flourishes to distinguish the RS from the rest of its Q6 brethren.

As it stands, there's not a whole lot to tell the Q6 and SQ6 apart, besides the badging, of course. Except for the plasticized grille, they could easily be mistaken for an internal combustion SUV. That's a good thing for traditionalists, and it remains modern enough to please shoppers that are drawn to a sleeker aesthetic. There is a lot going on stylistically, with sharp creases over the wheels, bulging flares, and deep sculpted body panels. That's quite a bit to pack into one vehicle, but in my head, it's busy, not cluttered — almost like a well-organized tool chest.

Inside, the Q6 adopts a simpler and more elemental design. A broad single panel houses both the digital instrument panel and the 14.5-inch infotainment touchscreen. There's also an available touchscreen just for the front passenger, allowing them to play copilot with navigation help or assume the role of mobile DJ. They can also enjoy games and streaming video without distracting the driver as a privacy filter effectively blocks the on-screen content.

For the most part, it's easy to use the infotainment system, while the navigation paired with the head-up-display deserves a special shout-out. Animated arrows and icons show up as augmented reality overlays in your forward vision, eliminating a good chunk of anxiety when driving through unfamiliar areas. Meanwhile, swarm data gathered from other vehicles' camera systems can give the driver advanced warning of upcoming hazards. We didn't experience any of those instances on our drive, but the potential could be huge.

The new infotainment system also benefits from improved voice controls. The Audi Assist function now features more than 800 commands, and is further enhanced with ChatGPT to handle more esoteric requests. This was especially helpful in our Euro-spec Q6, which activated the annoying mandatory speed warning chime every time we peeked past the posted speed limit. I couldn't find the on-screen setting to disable it and reverted to saying, "Hey Audi, turn off the speed warning." It wouldn't disable it outright, but the system at least took me to the menu where I could turn it off myself.

The front seats are typical Audi with firm, supportive padding, but well-shaped for many hours of comfortable touring. The rear seats had plenty of headroom to accommodate my 5-foot-10 frame, and there was an abundance of legroom to stretch out. According to my 6-foot-plus passenger, he was just fine back there, too. Behind those seats, the cargo area can hold up to 30.2 cubic feet, which is larger than the Q8 E-Tron's already generous 28.5 cubic feet. There's some additional storage under the floor as well as another 2.2 cubic feet in the frunk, which should be enough to stash the charge cable.

Altogether, the 2025 Audi Q6 E-Tron is a solid choice among electric SUVs, and represents a logical and welcome evolution of the company's plans. Its closest rivals are the larger and more expensive Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV and BMW iX. I'm personally partial to the Audi since I find the styling of those rivals a bit challenging (I'm still not over the BMW's grille). Objectively, the Q6 and SQ6 drive great, expertly balance comfort and performance, and give shoppers a more accessible pathway to luxury electric SUVs.

I'm struggling to find any significant faults, which is rare for me, but there's also nothing that truly blew me away. With any luck, the RS Q6 E-Tron will deliver those thrills, but until then the Q6 and SQ6 are supremely competent and enjoyable choices that will appeal to a wide range of shoppers. In essence, I think of them as a Porsche for the rest of us.

2024 Polestar 4 First Drive Review: No looking back

Ronan Glon

Ronan Glon

View the 74 images of this gallery on the original article

MADRID, Spain — Historically, carmakers have used windows as a selling point when there are more of them than you might expect. Volkswagen’s 23-window Bus, which was officially known as the Deluxe Microbus with Samba Package, was an upmarket trim that’s highly sought-after today, for example. On the other side of the pond, the flagship Citroën XM was available with a 13th window that kept wind out of the cabin when the hatch was open. With the 4, Polestar argues the industry has reached peak window.

As far as eccentricities go, the lack of a rear window isn’t a minor one. We’re not talking about a van you’d see in a contractor’s fleet; this is a premium EV. There’s more to it than a glass-less hatch, however. After driving a pre-production car on a test track, I’m taking the 4 out on public roads.

First, a word about positioning. Don’t read too much into the “4” nameplate; Polestar names its cars in the order that they’re launched in. The 4 is, quite simply, the fourth Polestar model unveiled, and it’s positioned below the 3 in terms of pricing and size. The segment it competes in is relatively hard to pin down. It’s an SUV in the same sense that a taco is a sandwich: it ticks most of the right boxes on paper but it doesn’t really look the part. It’s more of a tall-ish sedan-hatchback mash-up. Or, maybe a crossover in the literal sense of the term rather than in the commonly accepted sense.

Regardless, the 4 certainly turns heads. There’s nothing else quite like it on the road. It falls in line with Polestar’s design language by adopting styling cues like T-shaped headlights, a grille-less front end and a thin rear light bar, but it’s not a photocopy of an existing model. It has its own identity.

Polestar claims that it has a very good reason for leaving out the rear window. “We wanted to have a coupe body style for aerodynamics and at the same time get a really spacious interior,” Maximilian Missoni, the brand’s head of design, told me. The window-less solution made it possible to shift the D-pillar back and gain a few inches. “Another problem with coupes is that [in the rear-view mirror] you see a lot of your own interior – you see the headrests and maybe your passengers,” he added.

The sheetmetal hides the modular SEA architecture shared with several other brands in the Geely empire. Versions of this basic platform underpin the Volvo EM90 minivan sold in China, the Volvo EX30 and the Lotus Eletre, among other models. Buyers will have two configurations to choose from at launch. The base model is called Long Range Single Motor, and it ships with — you guessed it — a single electric motor that zaps the rear wheels into motion. It’s rated at 272 horsepower and 253 pound-feet of torque, and it’s equipped with a 100-kilowatt-hour lithium-ion battery pack.

Next up is the Long Range Dual Motor, which gets two motors (one per axle) for through-the-road all-wheel-drive. The second motor increases horsepower and torque to 544 and 506, respectively. This trim uses the same battery as the rear-wheel-drive version. Both drivetrains are built around a 400-volt electrical system, and range checks in at up to 300 miles with rear-wheel drive or up to 270 miles with all-wheel drive. Charging from 10% to 80% takes about 30 minutes with a 200-kilowatt charger.

The 4 shares about 85% of its infotainment system with the 3, but the software is displayed on a portrait-oriented 14.5-inch touchscreen instead of on a landscape-oriented one. The system is Android-based, and Polestar designed the user interface in-house with clear, easy-to-read icons and a split-screen functionality. The driver can notably select the ratio of the split; you can display the navigation system on the left 3/4s of the screen and show the media and phone widgets on the right 1/4, for example. Vice versa works, too, as does a 50/50 split. This cool feature makes the system more intuitive and less distracting to use. “We are not developing phones. We are making cars, and we have distractions to worry about,” Ruben Rodriguez, the company’s head of UX design, told me.

Like the 3, the 4 follows a minimalist approach to interior design. You’ll find very few buttons in the cabin. There are a handful on the steering wheel, they’re notably used for functions like adjusting the door mirrors and the steering column, and a volume knob on the wide, slanted center console. This extensive reliance on the touchscreen could catch old-school drivers off guard, but it’s increasingly becoming par for the course across the industry. Touchscreens can also add a touch of novelty to the experience: Polestar named the ambient lighting modes after the planets in the solar system, and you can poke your way through the galaxy while learning details like the length of a day on Mars.

My time behind the wheel was limited to the dual-motor version, and my test car was equipped with the optional Performance Pack. It doesn’t increase horsepower but it adds specific chassis tuning, 22-inch wheels wrapped by Pirelli P-Zero tires, Brembo brakes and gold-colored seatbelts. The huge brakes aren’t overkill: This is a roughly 5,200-pound car that gets from zero to 60 miles per hour in 3.8 seconds.

Performance is the 4’s dominant trait, at least in this configuration. It feels even quicker than the 3.8-second figure suggests thanks to the instant torque delivered by the electric motor, and the relatively low center of gravity combined with the 50/50 weight distribution give it better handling than you’d assume considering its size and weight. It’s not as sharp around a bend as the 3, which has a trick torque-vectoring rear axle, but the effort Polestar put into making the 4 engaging to drive shows. 

Unlike the 3, which rides on an air suspension system, the 4 features a conventional steel setup. It’s fixed in the rear-wheel-drive model and adaptive in the all-wheel-drive model. The latter gives the driver three modes called Standard, Nimble and Firm, respectively, to choose from. The same menu in the touchscreen also lets you select two types of power delivery (Range and Performance), three flavors of steering feel (Light, Standard and Firm), and three levels of one-pedal driving (Off, Low and Standard). By playing around with these settings you can create a tailor-made driving profile. The difference between these various settings is perceptible even in normal driving conditions. Hitting the suspension’s Firm setting reduces body roll at the expense of smoothness, while the steering gets noticeably heavier in Firm mode. You can guess which mode you’re in without looking at the screen.

Select the softer suspension and steering settings and the 4 becomes a comfortable place to travel in. Missoni’s words ring true: There’s a ton of space in both rows. Was that worth sacrificing the rear window for? It depends on your perspective. At its core, there’s nothing terribly unusual or alarming about the new system. Developed by Michigan-based Gentex, it consists of a 2.5-megapixel camera integrated into a little alcove on the roof that sends footage to an 8.9-inch digital rear-view mirror. You can flip down the mirror to take a look at which kid is throwing the punches in the back seat.

Our experience with camera-based mirrors has been mixed. One of my colleagues ran into glare-related issues with a similar system in the Volvo C40. I didn’t experience anything like that in the 4, but I thought the mirror was positioned too far back. I’d have moved it a few inches toward the windshield. Ultimately, it’s a matter of preference — that’s often the case with new technology. You might hate it, or you might love it. The problem is that if you hate it, you don’t have a second choice. It’s not like you can pay Polestar an extra $1,000 to order a 4 with a rear window and a real mirror.

So, have we reached peak window? The industry will decide. In a decade, the 4 will either stand out as a real oddball or as a trendsetter. Until then, it’s one of the more distinctive EVs on the market.

Polestar will initially build the 4 in Hangzhou Bay, China, though the model will also be manufactured in Busan, South Korea, starting in 2025. Pricing starts at $56,300 (including the $1,400 destination charge) for the rear-wheel-drive model and $64,300 for the two-motor all-wheel-drive version.

Maserati GranCabrio First Drive Review: Want an electric convertible? This is it

Maserati

View the 24 images of this gallery on the original article

LAKE MAGGIORE, Italy — Driving the Maserati GranCabrio Folgore on its picturesque home turf, and studying Maserati’s press materials, I’m convinced the Italian automaker has buried the lede. Especially when every auto journalist is questioning a pricing strategy that finds some GranTurismo coupes and GranCabrio convertibles brushing past $200,000. That gets into Cloud 9, Bentley-and-Aston-Martin territory.  To counter the whispers, here’s the part I’d be shouting about: The GranCabrio Folgore is the world’s first and only luxury electric convertible. That alone might intrigue some free-spending, first-on-their-block buyers.

Then, Exhibit B: Like the plug-in GranTurismo coupe, the convertible will out-accelerate any rival Bentley Continental GT or Aston DB12, a margin that grows positively yawning as speeds climb. A rocking 750 horsepower and rock-crushing 995 pound-feet of torque will do that. This Italian job is also noticeably more agile and connected to the road than the isolated Bentley droptop, and easily on par with Aston’s best GTs. That includes a gasoline Trofeo version whose 4,316-pound curb weight undercuts a GT Speed convertible by more than 1,100 pounds; mated to 542 horses from its twin-turbo, 3.0-liter Nettuno V6, a detuned version of the engine in the MC20 supercar.

This Italian sexpot is arguably a prettier car than the Bentley, and nearly as head-turning as the Aston, judging by public reaction to our convoy of beautifully painted models: Rose gold was a knockout specimen, along with a deep blue with metallic flake called Night Interaction, a burnt orange and a sizzling red. Anything but bright yellow, grazie.

The Maserati also carves out more passenger space than the British duo. It’s a legitimate four-seater with room for two adults in back — after a bit of space-sharing from front-seaters — versus a Bentley or Aston whose back seats are glorified parcel shelves. Finally, the Maserati’s vividly realized electric powertrain advances the tech future, where Bentley and Aston’s relatively pokey corporate V8s are rooted firmly in the past. So that’s four objective wins for the Maserati, in key areas I assumed auto journalists also cared about: Power and acceleration, sporty handling, interior space and technology.

Honestly, the Bentley’s only decisive win is its gorgeously wrought London library that doubles as a car interior. The Aston’s cabin also tops the Maserati’s in materials and execution. So score one win for Team Brexit, and four for Maserati. Hmm: Maybe it’s the Bentley and Aston that are overpriced?

That last bit is tongue-in-cheek, of course. Bentley and Aston can charge what they charge because of their brand cachet, however shaky at times. Stellantis’ Maserati brand is in no such position, its opaque reputation further clouded by tepid models like the Levante and Ghibli, and one egregious Quattroporte sedan, all out of production and unlikely to be missed. The brand is determined (again) to upgrade those perceptions, focusing attention on seemingly disparate SUVs and supercars.

The GranCabrio is another Maserati entirely. An opening run up the western shore of Italy’s Lake Maggiore, a vacation playground just north of Milan, let the Maserati play its GT role to the hilt. A tightly tailored soft top drops in 14 seconds and closes in 16, at speeds up to 31 mph. Behind that imposing Trident-capped grille, a clamshell “cofango” hood is formed from a single hunk of aluminum, eliminating unsightly cutlines over more than three square meters of surface area. The Maserati looks elegant yet powerful, with four swoopy fenders and an alluring silhouette with the roof up or down.

For the gasoline Trofeo, the compact V6 sits entirely behind the front axle. That allows a sexily crouched front end and hood that would have been impossible with a V8, and makes room for a driven front axle. Trunk space suffers a bit versus the coupe, at a maximum 6.1 cubic feet with the top up, or 4.6 cubes with the roof tucked away.

Maserati

View the 17 images of this gallery on the original article

The start is a great opportunity to soak up morning rays and listen to a Sonus Faber audio system by the Italian audiophile company, which is among the best and clearest I’ve experienced in a convertible. Even at highway speeds, music sounds like, well, music. At any speed, on any road, this GranCabrio is a joy to drive, or to ride shotgun in: Fluid and relaxed, but ready to spring into action and fly through these shore-hugging curves.

The Folgore puts a trio of electric motors to work, each rated at 300 kilowatts. In GT mode, the GranCabrio prioritizes front-driven wheels to save energy. Sport and Corsa modes dial up contributions from dual rear electric motors, mounted inboard to aid balance. Those three radial motors could generate up to 1,200 horsepower, but are limited to 750 wheel-horsepower by total battery capacity. Compact silicon-carbide inverters boost rapid energy conversion and performance.

 An 800-volt architecture allows DC charging at up to 270 kilowatts, right up there with the industry’s quickest-drawing EVs. A free Level 2 wall box allows home charging at up to 11 kilowatts. Maserati figures a 450-kilometer range on Europe’s WLPT cycle, which should equate to a roughly 260-mile range under the EPA’s more-realistic estimate.

Try these numbers on for size: At just over 5,200 pounds, Maserati’s all-electric convertible weighs about 200 fewer pounds than Bentley’s gasoline-powered Continental GT Speed convertible. That’s a first for any apples-to-apples, EV-versus-ICE comparison. Some credit goes to a weight-saving, largely aluminum chassis with sprinkles of magnesium. Combine that with 750 horses and 995 pound-feet of eye-blink torque, and it’s the definition of an unfair ICE fight.

A company-estimated 2.8-second surge to 60 mph feels like sandbagging, based on the seat of my pants. A 9.1-second rip to 124 mph (200 kph) beats even Porsche’s Taycan Turbo S coupe by 0.5 seconds. And it’s about 4.5 seconds quicker than that 650-hp GT Speed convertible. Buh-bye, Bentley.

The Trofeo, for its feathery part, weighs about 1,150 fewer pounds than the Bentley convertible, imbuing this Italian GT with acceleration on par with more powerful gasoline competitors, along with agility you can’t fake.

That blistering acceleration isn’t some one-note parlor trick.  Unlike EVs with skateboard platforms — which push rooflines awkwardly higher — the Maserati integrates 92.5 kilowatt-hours of LG Chem pouch cells in a T-shape along the center spine and behind rear seats. Coupe or convertible, Maserati claims the industry’s lowest-riding EV. With more battery mass centered in the car, the Maserati turns in with notable eagerness, and avoids the dull understeer that plagues many EVs as they approach handling limits. Throw in excellent suspension tuning and balance, with a 48/52-percent bias between front and rear, and the Maserati definitely leans toward the sporty end of the GT spectrum, without sacrificing ride quality.

Steering is a high point, a sommelier-level pairing with the Maserati’s creamy-yet-spicy electric powertrain. That steering is light, connected and natural, with none of the numb or synthetic on-center feel that mars many EVs. In the highest compliment, the GranCabrio just drives like an Italian car. I’ll say it again, having driven both coupe and convertible Folgores: The Maserati steers better than a Porsche Taycan. And it sets a new bar for other EVs — including anything from Dodge, Jeep and other Stellantis brands — to shoot for.

If only the interior felt as rich as the performance. A mostly traditional GT cabin that would pass muster at, say, $100,000 or $120,000 draws more skepticism and scrutiny at these prices. Mushy-feeling plastic dashboard switches for the transmission are the prime offender, followed by switchgear for windows and steering wheel that look straight from Stellantis’ parts bin. The leather is sumptuous, at least, including a bright-red holiday wrapper in the Trofeo we tested. A digital version of Maserati’s traditional analog clock also displays data such as g-forces. A clever “saddle-shaped” screen ensures that none of the display elements are blocked by the steering wheel. The Folgore features industry-exclusive Econyl, a neoprene-like fabric whose fibers are derived from old fishing nets, carpeting and other recycled nylon sources.

The Stellantis-based infotainment system’s dual center screen recalls an oversized flip phone, integrated into the lower dash and making room for a small console cubby. An infernal haptic slider controls volume, its display washing out badly in sunlight, but a secondary volume control lives behind the steering wheel.

On a tight mountain ascent and descent near the Swiss border, the Folgore comes into its own, a near-silent magic carpet gliding through corners at speeds that might make Aladdin wet himself. Grip is appropriately monumental, with Maserati eschewing all-season or energy-saving rubber for summer Pirelli P Zeroes, staggered at 20 inches front, 21 inches rear. Well-chosen EV audio sound hums sweetly and avoids EDM gimmickry. Regenerative brakes, operated through Ferrari-esque metal paddles, could use an additional setting for one-pedal driving, but their three settings offer a reasonable range between pure coasting and strong deceleration.

Now, if you’re sitting down, let’s run through prices: The GranCabrio Trofeo starts from $193,995 (including $1,995 in destination), or $206,995 for the electric Folgore. I won’t strenuously defend the gasoline Trofeo at that price; despite capable and competitive performance, it’s not as singular and special as the Folgore.

It’s fair to question the Maserati’s stratospheric pricing strategy. But you can’t question the Folgore’s performance and technological bona fides, which objectively meet or beat anything in its class. If we’re talking electric convertibles, it’s currently a class of one. That makes the Maserati a unique alternative to, say, a Porsche Taycan Turbo S. And let’s be clear: Nobody is selling more than a few thousand GTs a year in any price segment. Last I checked, no one runs around claiming Bentley, Aston Martin or Porsche are great financial values. Since most of us can’t afford any of them, one more overpriced grand tourer isn’t hurting anyone.